So what is the deal with people who insist on taking insult at things said in comments, especially to mumms, when in fact they were not insulted, directly, or inderectly. If a statement is made concerning a type of behavior which is clearly pointed out as being contrary toa religious belief, or pure hypocrasy of some sort, generally politically, how is this a personal attack on this third part, who was not addressed in the comment.
I can't decide if these people are being willfully stupid, and insistent on demonstrating that fact to as many people as possible, or if they are simply illiterate, or misreading things, and not bothering to check what was really said before going on a diatribe against what they thought was said.
Either way, it seems that some of them ought to be embarrassed at the least for pulling an Emily Litella, and the rest should get a clue, and hire someone to think for them, and then write out their alleged position clearly. They also should grasp the difference between leveling an insult at behavior in general, and leveling a personal attack.
